We are fully certified expert Party Wall Surveyors with years of experience producing Set up of Condition reports and lawfully serving Party Wall Agreements and Notices.

With offices in Central, South and North London it makes us completely positioned to serve Greater London and the surrounding counties.

Whether you’re a Building Owner preparing a new project or a neighbour who has been served a Party Wall Notice our knowledge and experience ensures we are constantly best prepared to help with your Party Wall requirements.

Call now and talk to a Specialist Surveyor for friendly expert recommendations.

Party Wall (WikiPedia)

A party wall (occasionally parti-wall or parting wall, also known as common wall or as a demising wall) is a dividing partition between two adjoining buildings that is shared by the occupants of each residence or business. Typically, the builder lays the wall along a property line dividing two terraced houses, so that one half of the wall’s thickness lies on each side. This type of wall is usually structural. Party walls can also be formed by two abutting walls built at different times. The term can be also used to describe a division between separate units within a multi-unit apartment complex. Very often the wall in this case is non-structural but designed to meet established criteria for sound and/or fire protection, i.e. a firewall.

wall party

Party Wall Act

The Party Wall and so on. Act 1996 is an allowing Act, insofar as it approves the owner of a residential or commercial property the legal right to undertake particular works that might otherwise constitute trespass or annoyance.

It likewise looks for to safeguard the interests of adjoining owners from any potentially negative results that such works might have by enforcing a requirement that all adjacent owners be given prior notice of them.

In addition, the Act offers an obligatory disagreement resolution procedure moderated by a statutorily designated property surveyor or property surveyors if neighbouring owners have concerns about the application of any proposal so informed.

Particularly, such notification needs to be served where the owner of a property (known as ‘the structure owner’) means to carry out any building and construction work described in Sections 1, 2 and 6 of the Act. Keep in mind that it is only those works that are covered by the Act and the scope is limited to the following:

The info that Notices should supply in respect of works covered the above areas is various in each case. The requirements of Section 1 and Area 6 Notices are set out in those sections but the requirements of a Notice relating to Section 2 works is set out in Section 3 of the Act. It is very important to note that the validity of any notification not offering all the pertinent details or served in the inaccurate manner, could be open to challenge in Court.

There is no basic kind of Notice although many individuals use those released by the RICS or variations appended to the explanatory brochure provided by the Department for Communities and Local Government. Provided all the information needed by the relevant area of the Act is present, an easy letter would be equally legitimate.

Depending on the scenarios of any provided task there might be more than one adjoining owner on whom observe requirements to be served in respect of the exact same work and, in the case of deep excavations, an Adjacent Owner might be aside from an immediate neighbour. It is constantly more suitable to go over the intended deal with adjacent owners prior to serving them with formal composed notice – a proposition well discussed might alleviate issues enough to prevent a dispute emerging and avoid the necessity to select property surveyors.

There are two exceptions where the need to serve notice may be avoided:

  1. De minimis works: The federal government’s explanatory pamphlet states that some deal with a party wall might be so small that service of notification under the Act would be normally considered as not essential and give as examples works not likely to impact the structural strength or support functions of a party structure or trigger damage to the neighbours side of it, such as re-plastering, shallow chasing for electrical circuitry or inserting power sockets, and screws to support racks, kitchen cabinets, and so on.
  2. Works under Area 2 of the Act provided that composed consent is acquired from all Adjoining Owners and Occupiers before work commences.

The three types of Notification are understood, respectively as:

A party structure notice should be served a minimum of 2 months before the date on which it is proposed to begin that work. The other two notices need to be served a minimum of one month prior to work commencing.

The mandatory info which Sees should include are as follows:

The majority of the pro-forma notifications in use include the following details as a matter of course no matter the kind of notification:

Section 10 of the Act states that where an adjacent owner does not consent in writing to works alerted by the structure owner under Areas 3 and 6, both celebrations need to either agree on the visit of a single property surveyor to act for both of them (referred to as the Agreed Property Surveyor), or each appoint their own surveyor, to determine by award matters in dispute in between the celebrations.

Where a task is straightforward, this might only involve factor to consider of the time and manner in which those works are to be performed. In more complex plans, believed will have to be provided to a commensurately greater number of elements and indeed designated surveyors have the statutory jurisdiction to make an award in regard of any matter connected with any work to which the act relates.

The same treatment is used to deal with any subsequent disagreements between neighbouring owners that might occur in relation to the alerted works, consisting of any loss or damage suffered by an adjoining owner as a result of their execution.

Inaction on the part of the adjoining owner does not halt the statutory process. A dispute can develop by an adjoining owner actively dissenting, that is, interacting to the structure owner an objection in regard of some matter occurring out of or incidental to the works – the ways of making that objection are not important, however if he stays silent, neither dissenting nor consenting for a period of 14 days after having actually been served with a Notice under either Area 3 or Area 6, the Act considers a dissent to have actually arisen in any event.

There is no considered dissent provision in Area 1 of the Act. A legitimate conflict can still emerge, and surveyors be appointed in accordance with Area 10, in respect of works informed under that area however just as relates to actual dissent on specific premises. An adjoining owner’s factors for challenging Area 2 and Section 6 works are hardly ever defined prior to the consultation of surveyors and in most cases not even then.

Where dissent has actually arisen, whether actual or deemed, both owners are legally obliged to designate an agreed property surveyor or, if they can not jointly agree on a single person, a surveyor each and if requested to make such a consultation by the other party, must do so within 10 days of the demand being served. Failure to comply, instantly gives the owner making the request the statutory authority to select a surveyor on behalf of the recalcitrant party. This procedure is set out in area 10( 4) of the Act.

Where 2 property surveyors are designated, they are required to agree upon the choice, in composing, of a third property surveyor who might be called upon by either of the property surveyors or either of the celebrations to figure out the contested matters and make the required award. The 3rd property surveyor is never appointed by anyone however the Act gives the individual so picked the same statutory powers as the two surveyors.

Third property surveyors are most typically hired where the two property surveyors have actually reached an impasse in their considerations over some specific point and often this can be in respect on the reasonableness of the fees of the surveyor appointed by the adjacent owner. Rarely will a 3rd property surveyor be asked to draw up an award in respect of the entire works however may accompany one or other of the two surveyors to do so if the need arises.

There is no meaning of who can be a property surveyor, however it should not be the same person that will supervise the works.

The award will set out the works that can be performed, who will pay the fees for the preparation of the award and examination of the works to guarantee that they abide by the works, and who will spend for the works. If the work is exclusively for the advantage of the building owner, then they will usually be needed to pay the costs and the cost of the works.

If they disagree with the award, parties have 14 days to appeal to the county court.

The Act allows access to the adjacent property for the functions of carrying out the works whether the adjoining owner gives permission or not, nevertheless they should be provided 14 days notification.

NB: The intro of The Party Wall and so on. Act 1996 (Electronic Communications) Order 2016 suggests that from 6 April 2016, notices and other documents can be served by electronic communications.

The details that Sees need to offer in regard of works covered the above sections is various in each case. The requirements of Area 1 and Section 6 Notifications are set out in those sections but the requirements of a Notice relating to Area 2 works is set out in Section 3 of the Act. A legitimate conflict can still occur, and property surveyors be selected in accordance with Section 10, in respect of works alerted under that section however just as relates to actual dissent on particular grounds. An adjacent owner’s factors for disputing Section 2 and Area 6 works are hardly ever defined prior to the appointment of property surveyors and in numerous cases not even then.

Where dissent has actually occurred, whether actual or deemed, both owners are legally required to select an agreed surveyor or, if they can not collectively concur on a single person, a surveyor each and if asked for to make such a visit by the other party, must do so within 10 days of the demand being served.

Related Articles

Around the Web