We are Party Wall Surveyors specialising in party wall issues in UK. We have more than twenty 5 years experience of operating in UK, acting for experts, companies, along with for individuals.

Each brief is unique, and our dedicated team of party wall surveyors is experienced in handling all manner of concerns connecting to party walls. We are proud to use a bespoke service to match the differing requirements of our customers.

This website is developed to supply fundamental information as well as using you the chance to call us directly with your requirements and problems, hence enabling our professional Party Wall Surveyors to recommend you accordingly.

The present legislation dealing with party walls and associated matters is the Party Wall and so on. Act 1996, which governs the rights and obligations of those proposing work to party walls/structures, and/or underpinning thereof, surrounding excavations and/or foundations (consisting of stacked structures).

Our group of Faulkners Surveyors Party Wall Surveyors supplies a special niche service, which enables you to have the best quality service at competitively priced costs.

For additional information contact among our Faulkners Surveyors Party Wall property surveyors on 03300100262.

Party Wall (WikiPedia)

A party wall (occasionally parti-wall or parting wall, also known as common wall or as a demising wall) is a dividing partition between two adjoining buildings that is shared by the occupants of each residence or business. Typically, the builder lays the wall along a property line dividing two terraced houses, so that one half of the wall’s thickness lies on each side. This type of wall is usually structural. Party walls can also be formed by two abutting walls built at different times. The term can be also used to describe a division between separate units within a multi-unit apartment complex. Very often the wall in this case is non-structural but designed to meet established criteria for sound and/or fire protection, i.e. a firewall.

wall party

Party Wall Act

The Party Wall etc. Act 1996 is an allowing Act, insofar as it approves the owner of a property the legal right to undertake certain works that might otherwise make up trespass or annoyance.

However, it likewise looks for to protect the interests of adjoining owners from any possibly adverse effects that such works may have by enforcing a requirement that all adjacent owners be offered prior notification of them.

In addition, the Act offers a mandatory conflict resolution procedure moderated by a statutorily appointed property surveyor or property surveyors if neighbouring owners have concerns about the application of any proposal so informed.

Particularly, such notice should be served where the owner of a home (called ‘the building owner’) means to carry out any construction work described in Sections 1, 2 and 6 of the Act. Keep in mind that it is only those works that are covered by the Act and the scope is limited to the following:

The info that Observes need to offer in respect of works covered the above areas is different in each case. The requirements of Section 1 and Section 6 Notifications are set out in those sections however the requirements of a Notice relating to Section 2 works is set out in Area 3 of the Act. It is essential to note that the credibility of any notice not offering all the appropriate information or served in the incorrect way, could be open to challenge in Court.

There is no basic type of Notice although many people use those released by the RICS or variations added to the explanatory booklet issued by the Department for Communities and City Government. Nevertheless, offered all the information required by the pertinent section of the Act exists, an easy letter would be equally valid.

Depending upon the situations of any provided project there may be more than one adjacent owner on whom notice requirements to be served in respect of the very same work and, in the case of deep excavations, an Adjoining Owner may be other than an instant neighbour. It is always more suitable to go over the desired works with adjoining owners prior to serving them with formal composed notification – a proposal well discussed may minimize concerns adequate to prevent a dispute developing and prevent the necessity to appoint surveyors.

There are two exceptions where the need to serve notice might be avoided:

  1. De minimis works: The federal government’s explanatory pamphlet says that some deal with a party wall may be so minor that service of notification under the Act would be generally regarded as not necessary and give as examples works not likely to affect the structural strength or support functions of a party structure or cause damage to the neighbours side of it, such as re-plastering, shallow chasing for electrical circuitry or inserting power sockets, and screws to support racks, cooking area cupboards, and so on.
  2. Functions under Section 2 of the Act provided that composed authorization is obtained from all Adjacent Owners and Occupiers prior to work commences.

The three types of Notification are understood, respectively as:

A party structure notice must be served a minimum of 2 months before the date on which it is proposed to start that work. The other two notices should be served at least one month prior to work starting.

The necessary details which Notices must include are as follows:

The majority of the pro-forma notifications in use include the following information as a matter of course despite the type of notification:

Area 10 of the Act stipulates that where an adjacent owner does not approval in writing to works informed by the building owner under Sections 3 and 6, both parties must either settle on the appointment of a single property surveyor to act for both of them (called the Agreed Surveyor), or each select their own surveyor, to figure out by award matters in dispute between the parties.

Where a job is straightforward, this might just involve factor to consider of the time and way in which those works are to be performed. In more complex schemes, thought will need to be provided to a commensurately greater number of aspects and certainly selected property surveyors have the statutory jurisdiction to make an award in regard of any matter gotten in touch with any work to which the act relates.

The same treatment is utilized to solve any subsequent disputes in between neighbouring owners that may arise in relation to the notified works, consisting of any loss or damage suffered by an adjoining owner as a result of their execution.

Inaction on the part of the adjoining owner does not stop the statutory procedure. A conflict can emerge by an adjoining owner actively dissenting, that is, interacting to the building owner an objection in respect of some matter occurring out of or incidental to the works – the means of making that objection are trivial, but if he stays quiet, neither dissenting nor consenting for a period of 2 week after having been served with a Notification under either Section 3 or Area 6, the Act considers a dissent to have actually arisen in any event.

There is no deemed dissent provision in Area 1 of the Act. A valid dispute can still develop, and surveyors be appointed in accordance with Section 10, in regard of works alerted under that section however just as regards actual dissent on specific grounds. An adjoining owner’s factors for challenging Section 2 and Area 6 works are hardly ever defined prior to the consultation of surveyors and in a lot of cases not even then.

Where dissent has actually emerged, whether actual or considered, both owners are legally obliged to select an agreed surveyor or, if they can not jointly agree on a single person, a property surveyor each and if asked for to make such a visit by the other party, should do so within 10 days of the demand being served. Failure to comply, instantly offers the owner making the request the statutory authority to designate a property surveyor on behalf of the recalcitrant party. This treatment is set out in area 10( 4) of the Act.

Where 2 surveyors are appointed, they are obliged to agree upon the selection, in writing, of a third surveyor who may be hired by either of the surveyors or either of the celebrations to figure out the challenged matters and make the necessary award. The 3rd surveyor is never designated by anyone but the Act gives the person so selected the very same statutory powers as the two property surveyors.

3rd surveyors are most commonly called upon where the two property surveyors have reached an impasse in their considerations over some particular point and often this can be in respect on the reasonableness of the charges of the surveyor selected by the adjacent owner. Seldom will a 3rd property surveyor be asked to prepare an award in respect of the entire works however may join with one or other of the two property surveyors to do so if the requirement arises.

There is no definition of who can be a property surveyor, but it should not be the same individual that will supervise the works.

The award will set out the works that can be performed, who will pay the costs for the preparation of the award and examination of the works to ensure that they comply with the works, and who will spend for the works. They will usually be needed to pay the costs and the cost of the works if the work is exclusively for the advantage of the building owner.

Parties have 2 week to interest the county court if they disagree with the award.

The Act permits access to the adjacent property for the functions of performing the works whether the adjoining owner allows or not, nevertheless they need to be given 2 week notice.

NB: The introduction of The Party Wall etc. Act 1996 (Electronic Communications) Order 2016 suggests that from 6 April 2016, notifications and other documents can be served by electronic communications.

The details that Observes should offer in regard of works covered the above sections is various in each case. The requirements of Area 1 and Section 6 Notices are set out in those sections but the requirements of a Notification relating to Section 2 works is set out in Section 3 of the Act. A valid conflict can still emerge, and surveyors be selected in accordance with Area 10, in respect of works informed under that area however just as relates to actual dissent on specific grounds. An adjacent owner’s factors for disputing Area 2 and Section 6 works are seldom defined prior to the appointment of surveyors and in many cases not even then.

Where dissent has actually developed, whether actual or considered, both owners are lawfully required to select an agreed surveyor or, if they can not jointly concur on a single individual, a property surveyor each and if requested to make such a visit by the other party, should do so within 10 days of the request being served.

Related Articles

Around the Web