Faulkners Surveyors (Party Wall) was established in 2010 and has proliferated over the past decade as a professional firm offering expert and dedicated services. Our group are dedicated to supplying a quality service for transparent and reasonable costs.
Our objective is to make the process as simplified and smooth as possible by taking all matters forward progressive and in line with the Act. We intend to keep all parties up to date with the process and supply guarantee and convenience in the understanding that qualified professionals in Party Wall Matters have actually been selected. The assurance that our surveyors are members of the Faculty of Party Wall Surveyors which the firm is a recognised RICS company provides a network of security and benefiting elements of the assistance and backing of governing bodies.
The director of Faulkners Surveyors (Party Wall) is likewise a chair for the Northern Home Counties location of the Faculty of Faulkners Surveyors (Party Wall) whom provides routine satisfies to guarantee all regional property surveyors have access to ongoing assistance and training. This guarantees that we depend on date with recent and relevant case Law in addition to basic practices and working policies.
Faulkners Surveyors (Party Wall) is therefore not just identified for its professional team and cost effective services by customers however also by and within the network of Party Wall Surveyors both locally and nationally.
Party Wall (WikiPedia)
A party wall (occasionally parti-wall or parting wall, also known as common wall or as a demising wall) is a dividing partition between two adjoining buildings that is shared by the occupants of each residence or business. Typically, the builder lays the wall along a property line dividing two terraced houses, so that one half of the wall’s thickness lies on each side. This type of wall is usually structural. Party walls can also be formed by two abutting walls built at different times. The term can be also used to describe a division between separate units within a multi-unit apartment complex. Very often the wall in this case is non-structural but designed to meet established criteria for sound and/or fire protection, i.e. a firewall.
Party Wall Act
The Party Wall and so on. Act 1996 is an allowing Act, insofar as it gives the owner of a residential or commercial property the legal right to carry out specific works that might otherwise constitute trespass or annoyance.
It likewise seeks to protect the interests of adjoining owners from any potentially negative results that such works may have by enforcing a requirement that all adjoining owners be offered prior notice of them.
In addition, the Act offers a mandatory conflict resolution procedure moderated by a statutorily appointed surveyor or surveyors if neighbouring owners have concerns about the implementation of any proposal so informed.
Specifically, such notification needs to be served where the owner of a property (referred to as ‘the structure owner’) plans to undertake any building and construction work explained in Areas 1, 2 and 6 of the Act. Keep in mind that it is just those works that are covered by the Act and the scope is limited to the following:
- Area 1 uses where it is proposed to erect a brand-new wall at a boundary that is not already built on.
- Area 2 concerns existing party structures, which include party partitions, walls and floorings (that separate buildings or parts of structures), party fence walls (essentially a boundary wall between lands in separate ownership which is built astride a limit) and, in some instances, a neighbour’s independent property.
- Section 6 can apply to excavations approximately 6 m away from a building or structure on neighbouring land, based on depth requirements which the Act sets out.
The information that Observes need to supply in respect of works covered the above sections is different in each case. The requirements of Section 1 and Section 6 Notices are set out in those sections however the requirements of a Notification connecting to Area 2 works is set out in Section 3 of the Act. It is essential to note that the credibility of any notification not supplying all the relevant details or served in the incorrect manner, could be open to challenge in Court.
There is no standard type of Notification although many individuals utilize those released by the RICS or versions appended to the explanatory pamphlet provided by the Department for Communities and City Government. Supplied all the info needed by the appropriate section of the Act is present, a basic letter would be similarly valid.
Depending upon the scenarios of any offered job there may be more than one adjoining owner on whom observe requirements to be served in regard of the same work and, when it comes to deep excavations, an Adjoining Owner may be aside from an immediate neighbour. It is constantly preferable to go over the intended works with adjoining owners prior to serving them with official composed notification – a proposal well discussed may alleviate issues enough to prevent a dispute occurring and avoid the necessity to appoint surveyors.
There are two exceptions where the need to serve notice might be prevented:
- De minimis works: The federal government’s explanatory pamphlet states that some works on a party wall may be so small that service of notification under the Act would be generally regarded as not essential and give as examples works unlikely to affect the structural strength or support functions of a party structure or trigger damage to the neighbours side of it, such as re-plastering, shallow chasing for electrical wiring or inserting power sockets, and screws to support racks, kitchen cupboards, and so forth.
- Functions under Section 2 of the Act offered that written permission is acquired from all Adjoining Owners and Occupiers prior to work commences.
The 3 kinds of Notice are understood, respectively as:
- Section 1: Line of Junction Notification
- Area 3 (for S2 works): Party Structure Notification
- Area 6: Notification of Adjacent Excavation
A party structure notice should be served at least 2 months before the date on which it is proposed to begin that work. The other 2 notices should be served a minimum of one month prior to work beginning.
The mandatory info which Notices should consist of are as follows:
- Line of Junction Notice:
- A sign of the structure owner’s desire to build a wall.
- A description of the wall.
- Party Structure Notice:
- The name and address of the structure owner.
- The nature and particulars of the proposed work.
- The date on which the proposed work will begin.
- Notice of Adjacent Excavation:
- An indicator of the structure owner’s propositions.
- A declaration regarding whether or not the structure owner proposes to underpin or otherwise reinforce or safeguard the structures of the building or structure of the adjoining owner.
- Accompanying areas and plans revealing: a) the site and depth of any excavation the building owner proposes to make; b) if he proposes to set up a building or structure, its site.
The majority of the pro-forma notifications in use include the following information as a matter of course no matter the type of notice:
- The date of the notice.
- The name and addresses of both the structure and adjacent owners (and the addresses of the properties being worked on/affected if different).
- A statement regarding the commencement of works relative to the proper notice duration.
- An advisory note discussing what happens if the recipient actively dissents from the works or fails to respond within 14 days.
Area 10 of the Act states that where an adjoining owner does not approval in writing to works informed by the structure owner under Areas 3 and 6, both celebrations should either agree on the appointment of a single property surveyor to act for both of them (referred to as the Agreed Surveyor), or each select their own property surveyor, to identify by award matters in dispute between the parties.
Where a job is straightforward, this might just involve consideration of the time and way in which those works are to be carried out. In more complex schemes, thought will need to be offered to a commensurately greater number of aspects and indeed appointed surveyors have the statutory jurisdiction to make an award in regard of any matter gotten in touch with any work to which the act relates.
The same procedure is utilized to deal with any subsequent disagreements in between neighbouring owners that might emerge in relation to the informed works, consisting of any loss or damage suffered by an adjacent owner as a result of their execution.
Inactiveness on the part of the adjacent owner does not halt the statutory procedure. A dispute can arise by an adjoining owner actively dissenting, that is, communicating to the structure owner an objection in respect of some matter emerging out of or incidental to the works – the means of making that objection are trivial, but if he stays quiet, neither consenting nor dissenting for a duration of 14 days after having been served with a Notification under either Area 3 or Section 6, the Act deems a dissent to have arisen in any event.
There is no deemed dissent arrangement in Area 1 of the Act. A legitimate disagreement can still occur, and surveyors be appointed in accordance with Area 10, in respect of works informed under that section however just as regards real dissent on specific grounds. An adjoining owner’s reasons for challenging Section 2 and Section 6 works are rarely defined prior to the visit of surveyors and in many cases not even then.
Where dissent has developed, whether real or considered, both owners are lawfully obliged to appoint a concurred surveyor or, if they can not collectively settle on a bachelor, a property surveyor each and if requested to make such a consultation by the other party, need to do so within 10 days of the demand being served. Failure to comply, automatically gives the owner making the demand the statutory authority to select a surveyor on behalf of the recalcitrant party. This treatment is set out in area 10( 4) of the Act.
Where 2 property surveyors are designated, they are required to agree upon the selection, in composing, of a 3rd property surveyor who might be hired by either of the surveyors or either of the parties to figure out the disputed matters and make the needed award. The 3rd surveyor is never appointed by anybody but the Act offers the individual so picked the exact same statutory powers as the two surveyors.
Third property surveyors are most frequently hired where the two surveyors have actually reached a deadlock in their deliberations over some particular point and frequently this can be in respect on the reasonableness of the charges of the property surveyor selected by the adjoining owner. Rarely will a third property surveyor be asked to draw up an award in regard of the whole works but may accompany one or other of the two property surveyors to do so if the requirement develops.
There is no meaning of who can be a surveyor, but it ought to not be the same individual that will monitor the works.
The award will set out the works that can be carried out, who will pay the costs for the preparation of the award and inspection of the works to guarantee that they adhere to the works, and who will spend for the works. If the work is entirely for the advantage of the building owner, then they will typically be required to pay the costs and the expense of the works.
If they disagree with the award, celebrations have 14 days to appeal to the county court.
The Act allows access to the adjoining property for the purposes of performing the works whether the adjoining owner gives permission or not, nevertheless they need to be given 2 week notification.
NB: The intro of The Party Wall etc. Act 1996 (Electronic Communications) Order 2016 suggests that from 6 April 2016, notifications and other files can be served by electronic interactions.
The details that Discovers must offer in respect of works covered the above sections is different in each case. The requirements of Section 1 and Section 6 Notices are set out in those sections however the requirements of a Notification relating to Area 2 works is set out in Section 3 of the Act. A legitimate dispute can still arise, and property surveyors be designated in accordance with Area 10, in regard of works alerted under that section but just as concerns real dissent on particular premises. An adjacent owner’s reasons for disputing Section 2 and Area 6 works are hardly ever defined prior to the consultation of property surveyors and in numerous cases not even then.
Where dissent has developed, whether real or deemed, both owners are lawfully obliged to designate a concurred surveyor or, if they can not jointly agree on a single person, a surveyor each and if asked for to make such an appointment by the other party, need to do so within 10 days of the request being served.
Around the Web