We are Party Wall Surveyors specialising in party wall issues in UK. We have more than twenty 5 years experience of working in UK, acting for specialists, services, as well as for people.

Each brief is distinct, and our devoted group of party wall property surveyors is experienced in handling all manner of problems associating with party walls. We are proud to offer a bespoke service to match the differing needs of our clients.

This site is developed to provide basic details in addition to providing you the chance to contact us directly with your issues and requirements, thus allowing our professional Party Wall Surveyors to recommend you accordingly.

The current legislation dealing with party walls and associated matters is the Party Wall etc. Act 1996, which governs the rights and obligations of those proposing work to party walls/structures, and/or underpinning thereof, surrounding excavations and/or foundations (including piled foundations).

Our group of Faulkners Surveyors Party Wall Surveyors offers an unique niche service, which enables you to have the very best quality service at competitively priced fees.

For more details contact one of our Faulkners Surveyors Party Wall surveyors on 03300100262.

Party Wall (WikiPedia)

Usually, the builder lays the wall along a home line dividing 2 terraced houses, so that one fifty percent of the wall surface’s thickness lies on each side. This type of wall is typically architectural. Celebration wall surfaces can likewise be formed by 2 abutting wall surfaces developed at different times.

wall party

Party Wall Act

The Party Wall and so on. Act 1996 is a making it possible for Act, insofar as it grants the owner of a property the legal right to undertake specific works that may otherwise make up trespass or annoyance.

It also seeks to secure the interests of adjoining owners from any potentially negative effects that such works may have by imposing a requirement that all adjoining owners be given prior notice of them.

In addition, the Act offers a necessary disagreement resolution procedure mediated by a statutorily selected property surveyor or property surveyors if neighbouring owners have concerns about the implementation of any proposal so informed.

Specifically, such notice should be served where the owner of a residential or commercial property (referred to as ‘the structure owner’) intends to carry out any construction work described in Areas 1, 2 and 6 of the Act. Note that it is just those works that are covered by the Act and the scope is restricted to the following:

The information that Observes should supply in regard of works covered the above areas is various in each case. The requirements of Section 1 and Section 6 Notifications are set out in those areas but the requirements of a Notification associating with Section 2 works is set out in Section 3 of the Act. It is very important to note that the validity of any notification not offering all the appropriate information or served in the incorrect manner, could be available to challenge in Court.

There is no basic type of Notification although many individuals utilize those released by the RICS or versions added to the explanatory booklet released by the Department for Communities and City Government. Nevertheless, supplied all the info required by the appropriate section of the Act exists, a simple letter would be equally legitimate.

Depending on the situations of any provided project there might be more than one adjoining owner on whom see requirements to be served in regard of the same work and, when it comes to deep excavations, an Adjacent Owner might be aside from an instant neighbour. It is always more effective to discuss the desired deal with adjoining owners prior to serving them with formal written notification – a proposal well explained may alleviate concerns enough to prevent a dispute emerging and prevent the necessity to appoint surveyors.

There are 2 exceptions where the need to serve notice might be prevented:

  1. De minimis works: The federal government’s explanatory booklet says that some works on a party wall may be so small that service of notification under the Act would be generally considered as not needed and give as examples works not likely to affect the structural strength or support functions of a party structure or cause damage to the neighbours side of it, such as re-plastering, shallow chasing for electrical circuitry or placing power sockets, and screws to support shelves, cooking area cabinets, and the like.
  2. Works under Area 2 of the Act provided that composed consent is gotten from all Adjoining Owners and Occupiers before work commences.

The three kinds of Notification are known, respectively as:

A party structure notice need to be served a minimum of two months prior to the date on which it is proposed to begin that work. The other 2 notices need to be served at least one month prior to work commencing.

The compulsory information which Observes should include are as follows:

Most of the pro-forma notifications in use include the following information as a matter of course regardless of the kind of notification:

Area 10 of the Act states that where an adjoining owner does not consent in writing to works notified by the building owner under Sections 3 and 6, both parties need to either agree on the consultation of a single surveyor to act for both of them (referred to as the Agreed Property Surveyor), or each select their own surveyor, to figure out by award matters in dispute in between the celebrations.

Where a job is straightforward, this may just include factor to consider of the time and manner in which those works are to be carried out. In more complex plans, thought will need to be provided to a commensurately greater number of aspects and undoubtedly appointed property surveyors have the statutory jurisdiction to make an award in regard of any matter connected with any work to which the act relates.

The very same procedure is utilized to resolve any subsequent conflicts in between neighbouring owners that may arise in relation to the informed works, including any loss or damage suffered by an adjacent owner as a result of their execution.

Inactiveness on the part of the adjacent owner does not stop the statutory procedure. A conflict can emerge by an adjacent owner actively dissenting, that is, communicating to the building owner an objection in respect of some matter developing out of or incidental to the works – the means of making that objection are not important, but if he stays silent, neither dissenting nor consenting for a period of 2 week after having been served with a Notification under either Area 3 or Section 6, the Act considers a dissent to have actually developed in any event.

There is no deemed dissent provision in Area 1 of the Act. A legitimate disagreement can still arise, and surveyors be selected in accordance with Section 10, in respect of works alerted under that area however just as regards actual dissent on particular premises. An adjacent owner’s reasons for contesting Area 2 and Section 6 works are seldom defined prior to the consultation of property surveyors and in a lot of cases not even then.

Where dissent has actually occurred, whether actual or considered, both owners are lawfully required to designate an agreed surveyor or, if they can not jointly settle on a bachelor, a surveyor each and if requested to make such an appointment by the other party, need to do so within 10 days of the request being served. Failure to comply, automatically offers the owner making the demand the statutory authority to appoint a surveyor on behalf of the recalcitrant party. This procedure is set out in section 10( 4) of the Act.

Where two surveyors are selected, they are required to agree upon the choice, in composing, of a 3rd property surveyor who might be called upon by either of the surveyors or either of the parties to identify the disputed matters and make the essential award. The 3rd surveyor is never ever selected by anybody but the Act gives the person so chose the very same statutory powers as the two surveyors.

Third surveyors are most typically called upon where the two surveyors have actually reached an impasse in their considerations over some particular point and often this can be in regard on the reasonableness of the charges of the surveyor designated by the adjacent owner. Seldom will a third surveyor be asked to prepare an award in regard of the whole works however might accompany one or other of the two property surveyors to do so if the need develops.

There is no meaning of who can be a surveyor, but it must not be the same individual that will monitor the works.

The award will set out the works that can be performed, who will pay the costs for the preparation of the award and assessment of the works to ensure that they abide by the works, and who will pay for the works. If the work is exclusively for the benefit of the building owner, then they will normally be needed to pay the costs and the cost of the works.

Parties have 14 days to appeal to the county court if they disagree with the award.

The Act allows access to the adjacent home for the purposes of carrying out the works whether the adjacent owner gives permission or not, nevertheless they must be provided 14 days notice.

NB: The introduction of The Party Wall and so on. Act 1996 (Electronic Communications) Order 2016 means that from 6 April 2016, notifications and other files can be served by electronic interactions.

The information that Sees should supply in regard of works covered the above areas is different in each case. The requirements of Area 1 and Area 6 Notifications are set out in those areas but the requirements of a Notice relating to Section 2 works is set out in Section 3 of the Act. A valid conflict can still emerge, and property surveyors be selected in accordance with Section 10, in regard of works informed under that section but just as relates to actual dissent on particular premises. An adjoining owner’s reasons for disputing Area 2 and Area 6 works are rarely defined prior to the visit of property surveyors and in many cases not even then.

Where dissent has developed, whether real or deemed, both owners are lawfully required to appoint a concurred property surveyor or, if they can not collectively concur on a single person, a property surveyor each and if asked for to make such an appointment by the other party, must do so within 10 days of the request being served.

Related Articles

Around the Web