Faulkners Surveyors (Party Wall) was established in 2010 and has actually grown rapidly over the past decade as an expert firm supplying expert and dedicated services. Our team are dedicated to providing a quality service for transparent and affordable costs.

Our aim is to make the process as smooth and simplistic as possible by taking all matters forward progressive and in line with the Act. We aim to keep all parties up to date with the process and offer guarantee and convenience in the understanding that qualified professionals in Party Wall Matters have actually been selected. The assurance that our property surveyors are members of the Professors of Party Wall Surveyors and that the firm is an identified RICS company supplies a network of security and benefiting aspects of the assistance and support of governing bodies.

The director of Faulkners Surveyors (Party Wall) is also a chair for the Northern Home Counties area of the Professors of Faulkners Surveyors (Party Wall) whom offers routine meets to ensure all local property surveyors have access to continuous support and training. This guarantees that we depend on date with recent and appropriate case Law as well as general practices and working policies.

Faulkners Surveyors (Party Wall) is for that reason not just recognised for its expert team and budget friendly services by customers however also by and within the network of Party Wall Surveyors both in your area and nationally.

Party Wall (WikiPedia)

A party wall (occasionally parti-wall or parting wall, also known as common wall or as a demising wall) is a dividing partition between two adjoining buildings that is shared by the occupants of each residence or business. Typically, the builder lays the wall along a property line dividing two terraced houses, so that one half of the wall’s thickness lies on each side. This type of wall is usually structural. Party walls can also be formed by two abutting walls built at different times. The term can be also used to describe a division between separate units within a multi-unit apartment complex. Very often the wall in this case is non-structural but designed to meet established criteria for sound and/or fire protection, i.e. a firewall.

wall party

Party Wall Act

The Party Wall etc. Act 1996 is a making it possible for Act, insofar as it approves the owner of a home the legal right to undertake certain works that may otherwise constitute trespass or annoyance.

It likewise seeks to protect the interests of adjacent owners from any possibly negative impacts that such works might have by enforcing a requirement that all adjacent owners be provided prior notification of them.

In addition, the Act provides for a mandatory conflict resolution procedure moderated by a statutorily selected surveyor or property surveyors if neighbouring owners have issues about the implementation of any proposal so informed.

Specifically, such notification needs to be served where the owner of a residential or commercial property (known as ‘the structure owner’) plans to undertake any building work described in Sections 1, 2 and 6 of the Act. Note that it is just those works that are covered by the Act and the scope is limited to the following:

The details that Notices must offer in regard of works covered the above sections is various in each case. The requirements of Area 1 and Area 6 Notices are set out in those areas however the requirements of a Notification associating with Section 2 works is set out in Section 3 of the Act. It is essential to note that the credibility of any notice not offering all the pertinent info or served in the incorrect way, could be available to challenge in Court.

There is no standard type of Notice although many people use those released by the RICS or versions appended to the explanatory pamphlet issued by the Department for Communities and Local Government. However, provided all the info required by the pertinent area of the Act is present, a simple letter would be equally legitimate.

Depending on the circumstances of any provided project there might be more than one adjacent owner on whom see requirements to be served in regard of the exact same work and, in the case of deep excavations, an Adjoining Owner might be besides an instant neighbour. It is constantly preferable to discuss the designated works with adjacent owners prior to serving them with formal written notice – a proposal well explained might alleviate concerns enough to prevent a disagreement emerging and avoid the requirement to appoint property surveyors.

There are two exceptions where the need to serve notice may be prevented:

  1. De minimis works: The government’s explanatory pamphlet says that some works on a party wall may be so small that service of notice under the Act would be generally regarded as not essential and give as examples works unlikely to affect the structural strength or assistance functions of a party structure or cause damage to the neighbours side of it, such as re-plastering, shallow chasing for electrical wiring or placing power sockets, and screws to support racks, kitchen cabinets, and so forth.
  2. Functions under Area 2 of the Act offered that written permission is gotten from all Adjacent Owners and Occupiers before work commences.

The three types of Notice are understood, respectively as:

A party structure notification need to be served at least two months prior to the date on which it is proposed to begin that work. The other two notices need to be served a minimum of one month prior to work beginning.

The obligatory information which Sees must include are as follows:

Most of the pro-forma notices in use consist of the following details as a matter of course no matter the kind of notification:

Section 10 of the Act stipulates that where an adjoining owner does not authorization in writing to works informed by the building owner under Areas 3 and 6, both celebrations should either settle on the visit of a single surveyor to act for both of them (referred to as the Agreed Surveyor), or each select their own surveyor, to figure out by award matters in dispute between the celebrations.

Where a project is straightforward, this may only involve factor to consider of the time and way in which those works are to be carried out. In more complex plans, believed will need to be provided to a commensurately greater number of factors and certainly selected surveyors have the statutory jurisdiction to make an award in regard of any matter connected with any work to which the act relates.

The very same procedure is used to deal with any subsequent disputes between neighbouring owners that may develop in relation to the informed works, consisting of any loss or damage suffered by an adjoining owner as a result of their execution.

Inaction on the part of the adjoining owner does not stop the statutory procedure. A conflict can occur by an adjoining owner actively dissenting, that is, communicating to the building owner an objection in regard of some matter occurring out of or incidental to the works – the means of making that objection are trivial, however if he stays silent, neither consenting nor dissenting for a period of 14 days after having actually been served with a Notification under either Area 3 or Section 6, the Act deems a dissent to have actually developed in any event.

There is no considered dissent arrangement in Area 1 of the Act. A legitimate conflict can still occur, and surveyors be appointed in accordance with Area 10, in regard of works alerted under that area but just as concerns actual dissent on particular premises. An adjacent owner’s factors for disputing Area 2 and Area 6 works are rarely specified prior to the consultation of property surveyors and in most cases not even then.

Where dissent has actually emerged, whether real or deemed, both owners are lawfully required to appoint an agreed property surveyor or, if they can not collectively settle on a bachelor, a property surveyor each and if requested to make such a consultation by the other party, must do so within 10 days of the demand being served. Failure to comply, instantly offers the owner making the request the statutory authority to designate a surveyor on behalf of the recalcitrant party. This procedure is set out in section 10( 4) of the Act.

Where 2 surveyors are appointed, they are required to agree upon the choice, in writing, of a 3rd surveyor who may be called upon by either of the surveyors or either of the celebrations to figure out the contested matters and make the required award. The third surveyor is never selected by anyone but the Act gives the person so chose the same statutory powers as the two property surveyors.

3rd property surveyors are most typically hired where the two surveyors have reached a deadlock in their considerations over some specific point and frequently this can be in regard on the reasonableness of the costs of the surveyor designated by the adjoining owner. Rarely will a 3rd surveyor be asked to prepare an award in regard of the entire works but might join with one or other of the two property surveyors to do so if the requirement occurs.

There is no definition of who can be a surveyor, however it must not be the same person that will monitor the works.

The award will set out the works that can be carried out, who will pay the charges for the preparation of the award and assessment of the works to guarantee that they abide by the works, and who will pay for the works. They will generally be needed to pay the costs and the cost of the works if the work is solely for the benefit of the building owner.

If they disagree with the award, parties have 14 days to appeal to the county court.

The Act allows access to the adjoining residential or commercial property for the functions of carrying out the works whether the adjoining owner allows or not, nevertheless they need to be offered 2 week notification.

NB: The introduction of The Party Wall and so on. Act 1996 (Electronic Communications) Order 2016 indicates that from 6 April 2016, notices and other documents can be served by electronic interactions.

The information that Observes need to provide in respect of works covered the above sections is various in each case. The requirements of Area 1 and Section 6 Notices are set out in those sections however the requirements of a Notification relating to Section 2 works is set out in Section 3 of the Act. A legitimate conflict can still develop, and property surveyors be appointed in accordance with Area 10, in regard of works notified under that area but just as relates to real dissent on specific premises. An adjacent owner’s reasons for disputing Section 2 and Section 6 works are seldom specified prior to the consultation of surveyors and in numerous cases not even then.

Where dissent has actually arisen, whether real or deemed, both owners are lawfully obliged to appoint an agreed surveyor or, if they can not collectively concur on a single person, a property surveyor each and if asked for to make such a visit by the other party, need to do so within 10 days of the request being served.

Related Articles

Around the Web