Faulkners Surveyors As certified and experienced Party Wall Surveyors we specialise in all Party Wall matters.
We cover every aspect needed to encourage upon and resolve Party Wall issues, such as:

  • Preparing and serving legitimate Party Wall Notices
  • Acting as the Structure Owners Party Wall Surveyor
  • Acting as the Adjoining Owners Party Wall Surveyor
  • Acting as the Agreed Party Wall Property Surveyor
  • Carrying out and preparing Schedules of Condition
  • Preparation and settlement of Party Wall Awards

All our Party Wall Surveyors are specialists and work in accordance with the guidelines set down by the Professors of Party Wall Surveyors.

The Party Wall Act and so on 1996 is law, failure to abide by this legislation might lead to works being illegal.

Party Wall (WikiPedia)

A party wall (occasionally parti-wall or parting wall, also known as common wall or as a demising wall) is a dividing partition between two adjoining buildings that is shared by the occupants of each residence or business. Typically, the builder lays the wall along a property line dividing two terraced houses, so that one half of the wall’s thickness lies on each side. This type of wall is usually structural. Party walls can also be formed by two abutting walls built at different times. The term can be also used to describe a division between separate units within a multi-unit apartment complex. Very often the wall in this case is non-structural but designed to meet established criteria for sound and/or fire protection, i.e. a firewall.

wall party

Party Wall Act

The Party Wall and so on. Act 1996 is a making it possible for Act, insofar as it approves the owner of a home the legal right to carry out specific works that may otherwise constitute trespass or annoyance.

However, it also seeks to protect the interests of adjacent owners from any possibly negative results that such works might have by enforcing a requirement that all adjoining owners be given prior notice of them.

In addition, the Act attends to a mandatory disagreement resolution procedure mediated by a statutorily designated surveyor or property surveyors if neighbouring owners have concerns about the application of any proposal so notified.

Specifically, such notification needs to be served where the owner of a property (called ‘the structure owner’) plans to undertake any building work described in Sections 1, 2 and 6 of the Act. Keep in mind that it is only those works that are covered by the Act and the scope is restricted to the following:

The details that Discovers need to offer in regard of works covered the above areas is different in each case. The requirements of Section 1 and Area 6 Notices are set out in those areas however the requirements of a Notification associating with Area 2 works is set out in Area 3 of the Act. It is very important to keep in mind that the credibility of any notification not providing all the relevant information or served in the inaccurate way, could be available to challenge in Court.

There is no basic form of Notification although many people utilize those released by the RICS or variations added to the explanatory brochure released by the Department for Communities and Local Government. Provided all the info needed by the appropriate section of the Act is present, a basic letter would be equally legitimate.

Depending upon the scenarios of any provided task there might be more than one adjacent owner on whom see needs to be served in respect of the exact same work and, in the case of deep excavations, an Adjacent Owner may be other than an instant neighbour. It is constantly more suitable to discuss the designated works with adjacent owners prior to serving them with formal composed notice – a proposition well explained might alleviate concerns enough to prevent a dispute occurring and prevent the need to select property surveyors.

There are two exceptions where the need to serve notice might be avoided:

  1. De minimis works: The federal government’s explanatory pamphlet says that some works on a party wall may be so small that service of notice under the Act would be usually regarded as not needed and give as examples works not likely to impact the structural strength or assistance functions of a party structure or cause damage to the neighbours side of it, such as re-plastering, shallow chasing for electrical circuitry or placing power sockets, and screws to support racks, cooking area cabinets, and so forth.
  2. Works under Section 2 of the Act provided that composed authorization is obtained from all Adjacent Owners and Occupiers prior to work commences.

The 3 types of Notice are understood, respectively as:

A party structure notice should be served a minimum of 2 months before the date on which it is proposed to begin that work. The other two notices must be served a minimum of one month prior to work beginning.

The mandatory information which Discovers should consist of are as follows:

Most of the pro-forma notices in use include the following information as a matter of course no matter the kind of notice:

Section 10 of the Act states that where an adjoining owner does not approval in writing to works notified by the building owner under Areas 3 and 6, both parties should either agree on the appointment of a single surveyor to act for both of them (referred to as the Agreed Surveyor), or each appoint their own property surveyor, to figure out by award matters in dispute in between the parties.

Where a task is straightforward, this may just include factor to consider of the time and manner in which those works are to be performed. In more complex schemes, thought will need to be provided to a commensurately greater number of aspects and undoubtedly designated property surveyors have the statutory jurisdiction to make an award in respect of any matter connected with any work to which the act relates.

The very same treatment is utilized to fix any subsequent disputes in between neighbouring owners that may develop in relation to the alerted works, consisting of any loss or damage suffered by an adjacent owner as a result of their execution.

Inaction on the part of the adjoining owner does not stop the statutory procedure. A dispute can emerge by an adjacent owner actively dissenting, that is, interacting to the structure owner an objection in respect of some matter developing out of or incidental to the works – the means of making that objection are trivial, however if he remains silent, neither dissenting nor consenting for a period of 14 days after having actually been served with a Notice under either Section 3 or Area 6, the Act considers a dissent to have actually arisen in any event.

There is no deemed dissent provision in Section 1 of the Act. A legitimate disagreement can still arise, and property surveyors be appointed in accordance with Area 10, in regard of works informed under that section but only as relates to real dissent on particular grounds. An adjacent owner’s reasons for challenging Section 2 and Section 6 works are seldom defined prior to the appointment of property surveyors and in many cases not even then.

Where dissent has actually occurred, whether actual or considered, both owners are legally required to appoint an agreed surveyor or, if they can not collectively agree on a single person, a surveyor each and if asked for to make such a consultation by the other party, should do so within 10 days of the request being served. Failure to comply, automatically gives the owner making the request the statutory authority to select a property surveyor on behalf of the recalcitrant party. This treatment is set out in section 10( 4) of the Act.

Where 2 surveyors are designated, they are obliged to agree upon the selection, in composing, of a 3rd property surveyor who might be called upon by either of the property surveyors or either of the celebrations to figure out the disputed matters and make the necessary award. The third surveyor is never ever selected by anyone but the Act provides the individual so chose the same statutory powers as the two property surveyors.

3rd surveyors are most typically called upon where the two property surveyors have actually reached a deadlock in their deliberations over some particular point and often this can be in regard on the reasonableness of the fees of the property surveyor appointed by the adjoining owner. Rarely will a third surveyor be asked to draw up an award in respect of the entire works but might accompany one or other of the two property surveyors to do so if the requirement emerges.

There is no meaning of who can be a surveyor, but it ought to not be the same individual that will monitor the works.

The award will set out the works that can be performed, who will pay the charges for the preparation of the award and examination of the works to ensure that they abide by the works, and who will spend for the works. They will usually be required to pay the charges and the expense of the works if the work is exclusively for the advantage of the building owner.

If they disagree with the award, parties have 14 days to appeal to the county court.

The Act enables access to the adjacent residential or commercial property for the functions of carrying out the works whether the adjoining owner gives permission or not, nevertheless they need to be offered 2 week notification.

NB: The introduction of The Party Wall etc. Act 1996 (Electronic Communications) Order 2016 indicates that from 6 April 2016, notifications and other files can be served by electronic interactions.

The details that Notices should offer in regard of works covered the above sections is various in each case. The requirements of Area 1 and Area 6 Notifications are set out in those sections but the requirements of a Notice relating to Area 2 works is set out in Section 3 of the Act. A legitimate dispute can still occur, and property surveyors be appointed in accordance with Section 10, in respect of works informed under that area however just as relates to actual dissent on particular grounds. An adjoining owner’s factors for disputing Section 2 and Area 6 works are seldom defined prior to the appointment of property surveyors and in many cases not even then.

Where dissent has emerged, whether actual or considered, both owners are lawfully required to designate an agreed surveyor or, if they can not jointly agree on a single individual, a surveyor each and if asked for to make such a visit by the other party, should do so within 10 days of the request being served.

Related Articles

Around the Web