We are Party Wall Surveyors specialising in party wall issues in UK. We have over twenty 5 years experience of working in UK, acting for professionals, companies, along with for people.

Each short is distinct, and our devoted team of party wall surveyors is experienced in handling all manner of concerns connecting to party walls. We are proud to offer a bespoke service to match the differing requirements of our customers.

This site is designed to offer standard information along with providing you the opportunity to call us directly with your problems and requirements, therefore enabling our professional Party Wall Surveyors to recommend you appropriately.

The current legislation dealing with party walls and associated matters is the Party Wall etc. Act 1996, which governs the rights and obligations of those proposing work to party walls/structures, and/or underpinning thereof, nearby excavations and/or structures (consisting of piled structures).

Our group of Faulkners Surveyors Party Wall Surveyors supplies a distinct niche service, which allows you to have the very best quality service at competitively priced costs.

To find out more contact one of our Faulkners Surveyors Party Wall property surveyors on 03300100262.

Party Wall (WikiPedia)

A party wall (occasionally parti-wall or parting wall, also known as common wall or as a demising wall) is a dividing partition between two adjoining buildings that is shared by the occupants of each residence or business. Typically, the builder lays the wall along a property line dividing two terraced houses, so that one half of the wall’s thickness lies on each side. This type of wall is usually structural. Party walls can also be formed by two abutting walls built at different times. The term can be also used to describe a division between separate units within a multi-unit apartment complex. Very often the wall in this case is non-structural but designed to meet established criteria for sound and/or fire protection, i.e. a firewall.

wall party

Party Wall Act

The Party Wall etc. Act 1996 is a making it possible for Act, insofar as it gives the owner of a property the legal right to undertake certain works that may otherwise constitute trespass or nuisance.

It likewise seeks to safeguard the interests of adjoining owners from any potentially unfavorable results that such works may have by imposing a requirement that all adjoining owners be offered prior notification of them.

In addition, the Act attends to a necessary disagreement resolution treatment mediated by a statutorily designated surveyor or surveyors if neighbouring owners have issues about the application of any proposal so notified.

Specifically, such notification should be served where the owner of a home (called ‘the structure owner’) intends to carry out any construction work explained in Sections 1, 2 and 6 of the Act. Keep in mind that it is only those works that are covered by the Act and the scope is limited to the following:

The details that Notices must provide in regard of works covered the above sections is different in each case. The requirements of Area 1 and Area 6 Notifications are set out in those areas but the requirements of a Notice associating with Area 2 works is set out in Section 3 of the Act. It is essential to keep in mind that the validity of any notification not supplying all the relevant details or served in the inaccurate way, could be open up to challenge in Court.

There is no basic type of Notification although many people utilize those published by the RICS or versions added to the explanatory booklet provided by the Department for Communities and Local Government. Provided all the info required by the relevant area of the Act is present, an easy letter would be equally valid.

Depending upon the circumstances of any provided project there may be more than one adjacent owner on whom see needs to be served in respect of the very same work and, when it comes to deep excavations, an Adjacent Owner might be other than an immediate neighbour. It is always preferable to discuss the designated deal with adjacent owners before serving them with formal written notice – a proposition well discussed may reduce issues adequate to prevent a dispute arising and avoid the need to select property surveyors.

There are two exceptions where the need to serve notice might be prevented:

  1. De minimis works: The government’s explanatory booklet states that some deal with a party wall may be so minor that service of notice under the Act would be normally considered not required and give as examples works not likely to affect the structural strength or assistance functions of a party structure or cause damage to the neighbours side of it, such as re-plastering, shallow chasing for electrical wiring or inserting power sockets, and screws to support shelves, cooking area cabinets, and so forth.
  2. Works under Section 2 of the Act provided that written permission is acquired from all Adjoining Owners and Occupiers prior to work commences.

The three kinds of Notification are known, respectively as:

A party structure notification need to be served a minimum of two months before the date on which it is proposed to start that work. The other 2 notifications must be served at least one month prior to work beginning.

The necessary information which Discovers should include are as follows:

The majority of the pro-forma notifications in use include the following info as a matter of course no matter the kind of notice:

Area 10 of the Act stipulates that where an adjacent owner does not authorization in writing to works alerted by the building owner under Areas 3 and 6, both celebrations should either settle on the appointment of a single surveyor to act for both of them (known as the Agreed Property Surveyor), or each appoint their own property surveyor, to figure out by award matters in dispute in between the celebrations.

Where a job is straightforward, this may only involve consideration of the time and manner in which those works are to be carried out. In more complex plans, thought will have to be given to a commensurately greater number of aspects and indeed appointed surveyors have the statutory jurisdiction to make an award in regard of any matter connected with any work to which the act relates.

The same procedure is used to solve any subsequent disputes between neighbouring owners that might develop in relation to the alerted works, consisting of any loss or damage suffered by an adjoining owner as a result of their execution.

Inactiveness on the part of the adjacent owner does not stop the statutory process. A dispute can occur by an adjacent owner actively dissenting, that is, communicating to the structure owner an objection in regard of some matter arising out of or incidental to the works – the means of making that objection are trivial, but if he remains quiet, neither consenting nor dissenting for a duration of 14 days after having actually been served with a Notification under either Section 3 or Section 6, the Act considers a dissent to have arisen in any event.

There is no deemed dissent arrangement in Area 1 of the Act. A legitimate conflict can still develop, and property surveyors be designated in accordance with Section 10, in regard of works alerted under that section but only as relates to actual dissent on particular premises. An adjoining owner’s reasons for challenging Section 2 and Section 6 works are seldom defined prior to the appointment of surveyors and oftentimes not even then.

Where dissent has actually arisen, whether real or deemed, both owners are lawfully obliged to appoint a concurred property surveyor or, if they can not jointly settle on a bachelor, a surveyor each and if asked for to make such an appointment by the other party, should do so within 10 days of the request being served. Failure to comply, automatically offers the owner making the demand the statutory authority to designate a property surveyor on behalf of the recalcitrant party. This procedure is set out in area 10( 4) of the Act.

Where 2 surveyors are designated, they are obliged to agree upon the selection, in writing, of a 3rd property surveyor who may be hired by either of the property surveyors or either of the parties to determine the challenged matters and make the necessary award. The third property surveyor is never designated by anybody but the Act gives the person so selected the very same statutory powers as the two surveyors.

3rd property surveyors are most frequently hired where the two property surveyors have actually reached a deadlock in their deliberations over some specific point and often this can be in regard on the reasonableness of the fees of the property surveyor appointed by the adjacent owner. Rarely will a third property surveyor be asked to draw up an award in respect of the entire works but may accompany one or other of the two property surveyors to do so if the need emerges.

There is no meaning of who can be a surveyor, but it needs to not be the same individual that will supervise the works.

The award will set out the works that can be carried out, who will pay the charges for the preparation of the award and examination of the works to guarantee that they abide by the works, and who will pay for the works. They will typically be required to pay the fees and the expense of the works if the work is solely for the advantage of the building owner.

Parties have 2 week to attract the county court if they disagree with the award.

The Act permits access to the adjoining home for the purposes of carrying out the works whether the adjacent owner gives permission or not, however they must be offered 2 week notification.

NB: The introduction of The Party Wall and so on. Act 1996 (Electronic Communications) Order 2016 indicates that from 6 April 2016, notices and other documents can be served by electronic interactions.

The info that Notices must supply in respect of works covered the above sections is different in each case. The requirements of Section 1 and Section 6 Notifications are set out in those sections but the requirements of a Notification relating to Area 2 works is set out in Section 3 of the Act. A legitimate disagreement can still develop, and property surveyors be appointed in accordance with Section 10, in respect of works notified under that section however just as relates to actual dissent on specific grounds. An adjoining owner’s factors for contesting Section 2 and Section 6 works are seldom defined prior to the appointment of surveyors and in many cases not even then.

Where dissent has actually developed, whether actual or deemed, both owners are lawfully obliged to appoint an agreed surveyor or, if they can not collectively agree on a single person, a property surveyor each and if requested to make such a consultation by the other party, must do so within 10 days of the demand being served.

Related Articles

Around the Web