Faulkners Surveyors is an independent firm of structure surveyors that specialise in the

Party Wall etc. Act 1996 acting for Building Owners, Adjacent Owners and as the Agreed Surveyor throughout London and the Home Counties.

Party Wall (WikiPedia)

Typically, the building contractor lays the wall along a home line separating two terraced houses, so that one half of the wall’s thickness lies on each side. This type of wall surface is normally structural. Celebration walls can also be created by 2 abutting walls developed at various times.

wall party

Party Wall Act

The Party Wall and so on. Act 1996 is a making it possible for Act, insofar as it approves the owner of a home the legal right to undertake certain works that might otherwise constitute trespass or annoyance.

However, it also seeks to secure the interests of adjoining owners from any potentially unfavorable results that such works may have by imposing a requirement that all adjoining owners be given prior notice of them.

In addition, the Act attends to a necessary dispute resolution procedure moderated by a statutorily designated surveyor or property surveyors if neighbouring owners have concerns about the application of any proposal so notified.

Specifically, such notification must be served where the owner of a residential or commercial property (referred to as ‘the structure owner’) plans to carry out any building work described in Areas 1, 2 and 6 of the Act. Keep in mind that it is just those works that are covered by the Act and the scope is limited to the following:

The info that Sees must provide in respect of works covered the above areas is different in each case. The requirements of Section 1 and Area 6 Notices are set out in those sections however the requirements of a Notification relating to Area 2 works is set out in Area 3 of the Act. It is necessary to note that the validity of any notice not offering all the relevant information or served in the incorrect manner, could be available to challenge in Court.

There is no standard form of Notification although lots of people use those published by the RICS or variations appended to the explanatory pamphlet issued by the Department for Communities and City Government. Provided all the info needed by the pertinent section of the Act is present, a basic letter would be equally legitimate.

Depending upon the situations of any provided project there might be more than one adjacent owner on whom see requirements to be served in respect of the same work and, when it comes to deep excavations, an Adjoining Owner may be besides an immediate neighbour. It is always more suitable to go over the intended works with adjacent owners before serving them with official composed notice – a proposition well discussed might alleviate issues adequate to prevent a disagreement arising and prevent the requirement to appoint property surveyors.

There are 2 exceptions where the requirement to serve notice may be avoided:

  1. De minimis works: The federal government’s explanatory booklet states that some works on a party wall may be so small that service of notice under the Act would be typically considered not required and give as examples works not likely to impact the structural strength or support functions of a party structure or trigger damage to the neighbours side of it, such as re-plastering, shallow chasing for electrical circuitry or inserting power sockets, and screws to support shelves, cooking area cupboards, and so on.
  2. Works under Section 2 of the Act offered that written authorization is obtained from all Adjacent Owners and Occupiers prior to work commences.

The 3 kinds of Notification are understood, respectively as:

A party structure notification should be served a minimum of 2 months prior to the date on which it is proposed to start that work. The other 2 notices should be served at least one month prior to work commencing.

The mandatory info which Sees should contain are as follows:

Most of the pro-forma notifications in use consist of the following info as a matter of course despite the kind of notification:

Area 10 of the Act states that where an adjoining owner does not authorization in writing to works informed by the structure owner under Sections 3 and 6, both parties need to either agree on the consultation of a single property surveyor to act for both of them (referred to as the Agreed Property Surveyor), or each appoint their own surveyor, to determine by award matters in dispute in between the parties.

Where a job is straightforward, this may just involve consideration of the time and manner in which those works are to be performed. In more complex schemes, believed will have to be offered to a commensurately greater number of factors and undoubtedly designated property surveyors have the statutory jurisdiction to make an award in respect of any matter connected with any work to which the act relates.

The very same treatment is utilized to resolve any subsequent disputes in between neighbouring owners that might arise in relation to the alerted works, including any loss or damage suffered by an adjoining owner as a result of their execution.

Inactiveness on the part of the adjoining owner does not halt the statutory process. A dispute can emerge by an adjoining owner actively dissenting, that is, interacting to the structure owner an objection in respect of some matter emerging out of or incidental to the works – the ways of making that objection are trivial, however if he stays quiet, neither consenting nor dissenting for a duration of 2 week after having actually been served with a Notice under either Area 3 or Section 6, the Act considers a dissent to have emerged in any event.

There is no deemed dissent provision in Area 1 of the Act. A valid disagreement can still develop, and property surveyors be appointed in accordance with Section 10, in respect of works informed under that section however just as concerns actual dissent on particular grounds. An adjacent owner’s factors for challenging Section 2 and Section 6 works are hardly ever defined prior to the visit of property surveyors and oftentimes not even then.

Where dissent has actually occurred, whether actual or considered, both owners are lawfully obliged to designate a concurred property surveyor or, if they can not jointly settle on a single person, a property surveyor each and if asked for to make such an appointment by the other party, need to do so within 10 days of the demand being served. Failure to comply, instantly gives the owner making the request the statutory authority to select a surveyor on behalf of the recalcitrant party. This procedure is set out in section 10( 4) of the Act.

Where two surveyors are appointed, they are required to agree upon the selection, in writing, of a third surveyor who might be called upon by either of the property surveyors or either of the celebrations to figure out the contested matters and make the needed award. The 3rd surveyor is never designated by anyone however the Act gives the individual so picked the same statutory powers as the two surveyors.

3rd property surveyors are most typically called upon where the two property surveyors have reached a deadlock in their deliberations over some specific point and often this can be in respect on the reasonableness of the costs of the surveyor selected by the adjacent owner. Seldom will a 3rd property surveyor be asked to prepare an award in regard of the whole works however may join with one or other of the two surveyors to do so if the requirement occurs.

There is no meaning of who can be a property surveyor, however it must not be the same person that will monitor the works.

The award will set out the works that can be carried out, who will pay the costs for the preparation of the award and assessment of the works to make sure that they abide by the works, and who will pay for the works. They will generally be required to pay the costs and the cost of the works if the work is solely for the advantage of the structure owner.

Celebrations have 2 week to interest the county court if they disagree with the award.

The Act allows access to the adjacent home for the purposes of carrying out the works whether the adjoining owner allows or not, nevertheless they must be provided 2 week notice.

NB: The intro of The Party Wall and so on. Act 1996 (Electronic Communications) Order 2016 indicates that from 6 April 2016, notices and other files can be served by electronic communications.

The info that Discovers must offer in respect of works covered the above sections is different in each case. The requirements of Section 1 and Area 6 Notifications are set out in those areas however the requirements of a Notification relating to Section 2 works is set out in Area 3 of the Act. A valid disagreement can still emerge, and surveyors be selected in accordance with Section 10, in regard of works alerted under that area but only as regards actual dissent on specific premises. An adjacent owner’s factors for contesting Section 2 and Area 6 works are hardly ever specified prior to the consultation of property surveyors and in numerous cases not even then.

Where dissent has developed, whether actual or deemed, both owners are lawfully required to designate an agreed property surveyor or, if they can not collectively agree on a single individual, a surveyor each and if requested to make such a visit by the other party, should do so within 10 days of the demand being served.

Related Articles

Around the Web